An application process acquires at least a share lock on the current row of every cursor.
Any row that is read during a unit of work cannot be changed by other application processes until the unit of work is complete.
Any row changed by another application process can be read, even if the change has not been committed by that application process.
An application process that issues the same query more than once in a unit of work will not see additional rows caused by other application processes appending new information to the database.
第1题:
Which of the following is NOT a way in which Custom Controls can be used?()
第2题:
Which of the following is TRUE for the DB2 isolation level Cursor Stability (CS)?()
第3题:
If an application issues the same query more than once in the same Unit of Work, which isolation level will not permit this application to see additional rows inserted by other applications?()
第4题:
A batch application executes a large number of update statements. The service level agreement for the application states that the application must complete its work as quickly as possible to ensure that dependent workloads can start ontime. What is one way to help the application complete quickly?()
第5题:
User Scott has updated the salary of one of the employees in the EMPLOYEES table and has not committed the transaction. What are the two types of locks that this scenario would lead to?()
第6题:
Which two statements are true regarding single row functions?()
第7题:
It was the first documented evidence of the psychological effects on doing work.
The Hawthorne study continued for five years.
They found that the workers responded not to the level of lighting but to the fact that other work conditions were not favorable.
The study changed the focus from economics to a multifaceted approach.
第8题:
null lock on the row being updated
null lock on the table containing the row
ROW SHARE lock for the row being updated
ROW EXCLUSIVE lock for the row being updated
shared row-exclusive lock for the row being updated
a shareable table lock for the table containing the row
exclusive table-level lock for the table containing the row
第9题:
Code the application to issue a LOCK TABLE statement.
Code the application to issue a LOCK ROW statement.
Decrease the number of I/O servers.
Increase the locklist parameter.
第10题:
Define the column MAINID as NOT UPDATABLE
Define the column MAINID as a PRIMARY KEY
Define the column MAINID as a FOREIGN KEY
Define an UPDATE trigger on table TABLEX
第11题:
Read Stability (RS)
Repeatable Read (RR)
Uncommitted Read (UR)
Cursor Stability (CS)
第12题:
Application B will read the row.
Applications A and B will cause a deadlock situation.
Application B will wait until application A releases the Update lock.
Application A will be terminated so that application B can read the row.
第13题:
Application A currently holds an exclusive lock on a single row and application B tries to access that row. If lock timeout is set to -1 and both applications are using isolation level RS, which of the following will occur?()
第14题:
Which of the following best describes the lock protection provided by DB2 for the current row of a cursor?()
第15题:
Application A holds an Update lock on a single row and application B is trying to read that row. If both applications are using isolation level UR, which of the following will occur?()
第16题:
What is true regarding InnoDB locking?()
第17题:
Which statement is true regarding subqueries?()
第18题:
Applications A and B will cause a deadlock situation
Application B will read the previous version of the row
Application B will read the row and see uncommitted changes made by application A
Application B will be placed in a lock-wait state until application A releases its lock
第19题:
InnoDB uses row and table-level locks, but row locks are not escalates
InnoDB locks only those rows that are updated
InnoDB only uses row locks, not page or table-level locks
InnoDB row locks may be escalated to page or table-level locks
InnoDB uses row-level or table-level locks depending on the number of rows affected
第20题:
The LIKE operator cannot be used with single-row subqueries
The NOT IN operator is equivalent to IS NULL with single-row subqueries
=ANY and =ALL operators have the same functionality in multiple-row subqueries
The NOT operator can be used with IN, ANY, and ALL operators in multiple-row subqueries
第21题:
As reusable UI assets
As a way to share some layout
Shared through templates (NTF) just like any other design element
As the runtime for anXPage application
第22题:
They are evaluated by all the three WHEN clauses regardless of the results of the evaluation of any other WHEN clause.
They are evaluated by the first WHEN clause. If the condition is true, then the row would be evaluated by the subsequent WHEN clauses.
They are evaluated by the first WHEN clause. If the condition is false, then the row would be evaluated by the subsequent WHEN clauses.
The INSERT statement would give an error because the ELSE clause is not present for support in case none of the WHEN clauses are true.
第23题:
An application process acquires at least a share lock on the current row of every cursor.
Any row that is read during a unit of work cannot be changed by other application processes until the unit of work is complete.
Any row changed by another application process can be read, even if the change has not been committed by that application process.
An application process that issues the same query more than once in a unit of work will not see additional rows caused by other application processes appending new information to the database.
第24题:
The cursor is only protected from updates and deletes by concurrent applications.
The row is only protected from positioned updates and deletes that reference another cursor of the same application.
The cursor is protected from positioned updates and deletes that reference another cursor of a different application.
The row is protected from updates and deletes by the current application and from positioned updates and deletes that reference another cursor of the same application.