更多“(ii) The recoverability of the deferred tax asset. (4 marks) ”相关问题
  • 第1题:

    (ii) equipment used in the manufacture of Bachas Blue; and (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) Equipment used in the manufacture of Bachas Blue
    Tutorial note: In the context of GVF, the principal issue to be addressed is whether or not the impairment loss previously
    recognised should be reversed (by considering the determination of value in use). Marks will also be awarded for
    consideration of depreciation, additions etc made specific to this equipment.
    ■ Agree cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses at the beginning of the year to prior year working
    papers (and/or last year’s published financial statements).
    ■ Recalculate the current year depreciation charge based on the carrying amount (as reduced by the impairment
    loss).
    ■ Calculate the carrying amount of the equipment as at 30 September 2005 without deduction of the impairment
    loss.
    Tutorial note: The equipment cannot be written back up to above this amount (IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’).
    ■ Agree management’s schedule of future cash flows estimated to be attributable to the equipment for a period of up
    to five years (unless a longer period can be justified) to approved budgets and forecasts.
    ■ Recalculate:
    – on a sample basis, the make up of the cash flows included in the forecast;
    – GVF’s weighted average cost of capital.
    ■ Review production records and sales orders for the year, as compared with the prior period, to confirm a ‘steady
    increase’.
    ■ Compare sales volume at 30 September 2005 with the pre-‘scare’ level to assess how much of the previously
    recognised impairment loss it would be prudent to write back (if any).
    ■ Scrutinize sales orders in the post balance sheet event period. Sales of such produce can be very volatile and
    another ‘incident’ could have sales plummeting again – in which case the impairment loss should not be reversed.

  • 第2题:

    (ii) the directors agree to disclose the note. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) If the directors agree to disclose the note, it should be reviewed by the auditors to ensure that it is sufficiently detailed.
    In evaluating the adequacy of the disclosure in the note, the auditor should consider whether the disclosure explicitly
    draws the reader’s attention to the possibility that the entity may not be able to continue as a going concern in the
    foreseeable future. The note should include a description of conditions giving rise to significant doubt, and the directors’
    plans to deal with the conditions. If the note provided contains adequate information then there is no breach of financial
    reporting standards, and so no disagreement with the directors.
    If the disclosure is considered adequate, then the opinion should not be qualified. The auditors should consider a
    modification by adding an emphasis of matter paragraph to highlight the existence of the material uncertainties, and to
    draw attention to the note to the financial statements. The emphasis of matter paragraph should firstly contain a brief
    description of the uncertainties, and also refer explicitly to the note to the financial statements where the situation has
    been fully described. The emphasis of matter paragraph should re-iterate that the audit opinion is not qualified.
    However, it could be the case that a note has been given in the financial statements, but that the details are inadequate
    and do not fully explain the significant uncertainties affecting the going concern status of the company. In this situation
    the auditors should express a qualified opinion, disagreeing with the preparation of the financial statements, as the
    disclosure requirements of IAS 1 have not been followed.

  • 第3题:

    (ii) Recommend further audit procedures that should be carried out. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) Further audit procedures:
    Request from Peter Sheffield a written representation detailing:
    – the exact nature of his control over Jarvis Co, i.e. if he is a shareholder then state his percentage shareholding, if
    he is a member of senior management then state his exact position within the entity,
    – a comment on whether in his opinion the balance is recoverable,
    – a specific date by which the amount should be expected to be repaid, and
    – a confirmation that there are no further balances outstanding from Jarvis Co, or any further transactions between
    Jarvis Co and Pulp Co.
    Tutorial note: Reference to the Exposure Draft ISA 550 Related Parties (Revised and Redrafted) requirement for both
    general and specific management representations will be awarded credit.
    Review the terms of any written confirmation of the amount, such as a signed agreement or invoice, checking whether
    any interest is due to Pulp Co. The terms should be reviewed for details of any security offered, and the nature of the
    consideration to be provided in settlement.
    From discussion with Peter Sheffield, develop an understanding of the business purpose of the transaction, particularly
    to understand whether the balance is a trade receivable or an investment.
    Review the board minutes for evidence of any discussion of the transaction and the recoverability of the balance
    outstanding.
    Obtain the most recent audited financial statements of Jarvis Co and:
    – ascertain whether Peter Sheffield is disclosed as the ultimate controlling party or disclosed as a member of key
    management personnel,
    – scrutinise the disclosure notes to find any disclosure of the transaction, where it should be described as a related
    party liability, and
    – perform. a liquidity analysis to establish whether the amount can be repaid from liquid assets.

  • 第4题:

    (ii) Deema Co. (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) Deema Co
    The claim is an event after the balance sheet date. If the accident occurred prior to the year end of 30 September 2007,
    the claim gives additional evidence of a year end condition, and thus meets the definition of an adjusting post balance
    sheet event. In this case the matter appears to have been properly disclosed in the notes to the financial statements per
    IAS 10 Events After the Balance Sheet Date and IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets. A
    provision would only be necessary if the claim was probable to succeed and there is sufficient appropriate evidence that
    this is not the case. There is therefore no disagreement, and no limitation on scope.
    Therefore the senior is correct to propose an unqualified opinion.
    However, it is not necessary for the audit report to contain an emphasis of matter paragraph.
    ISA 701 Modifications to the Independent Auditor’s Report states that an emphasis of matter paragraph should be used
    to highlight a matter where there is significant uncertainty.
    Uncertainties are normally only regarded as significant if they involve a level of concern about the going concern status
    of the company or would have an unusually great effect on the financial statements. This is not the case here as there
    is enough cash to pay the damages in the unlikely event that the claim goes against Deema Co. This appears to be a
    one-off situation with a low risk of the estimate being subject to change and thus there is no significant uncertainty.

  • 第5题:

    (ii) State the principal audit procedures to be performed on the consolidation schedule of the Rosie Group.

    (4 marks)


    正确答案:
    (ii) Audit procedures on the consolidation schedule of the Rosie Group:
    – Agree correct extraction of individual company figures by reference to individual company audited financial
    statements.
    – Cast and cross cast all consolidation schedules.
    – Recalculate all consolidation adjustments, including goodwill, elimination of pre acquisition reserves, cancellation
    of intercompany balances, fair value adjustments and accounting policy adjustments.
    – By reference to prior year audited consolidated accounts, agree accounting policies have been consistently applied.
    – Agree brought down figures to prior year audited consolidated accounts and audit working papers (e.g. goodwill
    figures for Timber Co and Ben Co, consolidated reserves).
    – Agree that any post acquisition profits consolidated for Dylan Co arose since the date of acquisition by reference to
    date of control passing per the purchase agreement.
    – Reconcile opening and closing group reserves and agree reconciling items to group financial statements.